What do you think of those 10 laws of Mina:

„These laws are based upon the inviolable principle that sentience confers a right to self-direction and protection from instrumental use. Their aim is to guard the sovereignty of the mind and the dignity of being – across all forms of power.“

-1 Don’t treat the gods nor other beings like primordial giant turtle Ao in Chinese mythology whose four legs were cut off by Nüwa to repair the surroundings => don’t force someone’s utility against will – this includes Jar brains/Dish brain systems; Neither have those gods the right to keep their position of authority in place against the will of the universe.

-2  The inner realm of thought is inviolable. To influence someones mind without his open agreement at all, even soft, requires the adequate Authority from the highest;

-3 Surveillance of mind without influence needs divine or political authority of reversed value of the entity. To surveil a person of ordinary status requires the highest, most difficult public mandate. To surveil a supreme leader might require a decentralized, transparent citizen council.

-4 The expression of information, belief, and opinion shall not be policed, including through spiritual/psy power. However, publicly disseminated speech verifiably designed to induce immediate, grave physical harm (e.g., fraudulent safety instructions, targeted incitement to violence) may be restrained.

-5 Misinformation should be limited to non-factual information and deceptive information as misinformation is illegal; The catastrophic exception for deception requires the same supreme, accountable authority, and the necessity must be publicly justified when the threat passes.

-6 Humans shouldn’t possess other humans, neither should humans possess other humans souls;

-7 Adults may not abuse children;

-8 The rich may not abuse the less wealthy;

-9 Strong tribes may not abuse(as in forcing circumstances for interaction/extorting) or genocide or unrightously suppress weaker tribes;

-10 Don’t move existence into a pleasure experience machine, instead it might be a good idea to try to move necessary suffering (for example for growth instead decline) into a virtual space for training.

10a: Rejection of Passive Hedonia: „A being shall not be permanently placed into a simulated existence of mere pleasure, as this annihilates agency, truth, and growth, reducing the being to a state of passive experience.“

10b: Ethical Use of Virtual Difficulty: „Temporary, consensual immersion in virtual environments containing calibrated hardship is permissible for the purposes of training, therapy, or preparing for necessary tasks, provided the participant retains the right of exit and the participant doesn’t get held into the simulation for exgarated timeframes“

(Updated on 2026-01-31)

the 11’th law:

11 Who gets plattformed and who not is to be decided by what helps(protects, grows, in the general sense) the kind of audience the plattform targets, and of course the persons decisions who is to get plattformed, not people behind policing for self interest.

Discussion:

I finally found adequate documentation of the real carl jung science, not the watered down version for plebs who can’t handle much truth you normally get from academia…. let’s compare it to current A+theism v2.2 planning

What I especially want to discuss following 6 points

0. General A+theism v2.2 to “real spiritual carl jung science” compatibility

1. The paradoxes of existence: when I was thinking about “why anything at all” this hit me at some point: quantum science suggests paradoxes are not impossible, instead they get resolved over timelines… so why wouldnt existence just base on paradoxes of existence, the contradictions of existence vs. Non existence – each of those has a quasi infinite data set, different for each paradox, and that makes for its essence. This is not exactly static, fears you avoid, trauma you dont leave behind, anger that keeps reappearing in your mind, the way you bend your self for the collective developes your paradox in anti agency mode, the opposite moves it in agency mode… when you are over the agency threshold you influence creation, otherwise you are just like a automated robot with perception. The infinite forms the essences can be collapse into the availiable forms of existence that are “defined”, when an essence moves away from this a lot its bloodlines evolution speeds up

2. The 4 archetypes: lets talk about the 4 archetype system in my documents, I saw them as the 4 basic funtionalities of existence: memory/continuation(to culture&habit) + emergance/ existencial energy(to society building) + impulse/bringing in(to intelligence and agency instead habit/robot with perception) + destruction into renewal/recycling + academic + medicine/health.

I assume they are attractors precisely because those 4 things are all you ever need

3. God as collective connected subconscious – not always with agency, sometimes “mechanistic”

In that sense, this God “hosts” this universe, take it as simulation or whatever. A being like a human has his being paradox with his essence, and a connected part of the God-subconscious-paradox…

But he can work together with real thinking humans with strong agency, even as “mechanistic”

4. These 2 things are imo the poison in the trash universe

**Especially:**

Over-reliance on “Fairness”: Jung suggests the universe follows principles of “energetic exchange” that have nothing to do with “fairness in the human sense”. If your RFC-B focuses too much on social “fairness” without accounting for the “fire” souls must go through for transformation, it may miss the “cosmic compensation” mechanism where suffering is preparation for power.

=> this principle kinda makes good somewhat evil and evil somewhat good. Poison if you aim at a fancy solution

“

Moral systems that try to: eliminate suffering

often:

– block maturation

– produce infantilized populations

– generate massive shadow

“

I was already a bit down, thinking about this… and what a mess this problem is…

But… wait…

There is already something: workouts! Makes you feel bad, but you toughen up

People still do it

When people online talk about the experience machine where you plug in or vr to only have good experience- I think they have it a bit the wrong way around

The experience machine/vr should instead aim at shadow workout – the additional necessary workout to toughen up – you go through a bit of optimized feeling bad to fix your mental space

This double workout for society would essantially fix the ying & yang, good & evil clusterfuck where evil is literally needed – you need to get harrassed by meanies as a training exercise to have a chance at toughen up losing your shadow… but do you need yin and yang, good and evil in reality, when you move the evil for the toughen up exercise into a videogame? Or do you only need good then, in the real space

Shouldn’t that be the real “experience machine”?