Someone asked me about my contributions…

For example like DNA mutation not necessarily being random, modes of consciousness, philosophic solutions for the what I was told 5 or something biggest philosophical problems which I to an extent forgot what they even were, but I know I also kinda solved the is-ought gap philosophical problem… also tons of other science and philosophical stuff
And some theist proofs
I also disproved a bunch of theistic arguments and the Bible evidence. I also partly disproved Islam.

Some of the issues I tackled:

• I found a technological solution to the co2 global warming problem
• Why is there something rather than nothing?
• The Ship of Theseus Problem
• The Hard Problem of Consciousness
• Is-Ought Gap
• DNA-Mutations not being random
• Quantum space Entropy explaining why life is not unlikely
• My theory of everything
• My moral system

Some Philosophers with similar ideas:

Schopenhauer, Lagan, Dewey and Carl Sagan and Diogenes +Silvio Gesell seemed to have some of the same ideas I did.

Some of my philosophy seems to have been stolen:

I make some argument or article, then the same thing in other words keeps appearing in journals or science or philosophy websites under other names, or literally as ones of Jordan Petersons great philosophies, later.
Also funny, I invent a solution to global warming, saying we just need to release enough specialized artificial gas, that binds with co2, creating fluid from it that falls down, ideally weak harmless plant fertilizers… then a bunch later planes fly around in our sky releasing gasses and afterwards you cannot see the stars anymore due to the gasses. (Here in Bavaria)
I never get anything for my work though.
The modes of consciousness science article even copied my dumb diagrams almost 1:1…

First me:

Then a bunch later science article:

If you have a really good parser for handwriting in your brain, you can decipher “conscious mode” on the pic I draw

Or other cases:

Also gotta love articles like this one
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-new-physics-theory-of-life/
(which is related to my Quantum space entropy which makes life likely theory)

or that one
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04269-6
(which has my DNA mutation is not random, but biased hypothesis)

or stuff like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGd8p-GSLgY

who copy my main thesis’s without mentioning me.

And about the is-ought gap:

Closing is ought gap:

Coming from a discussion where I took the stance that religion (referred to as bonding structure of shared beliefs) is important:

A tree does not evolve to unhelping ballast usually

But a tree has little degrees freedom

If you take ants, who have more degrees of freedom, they choose bonding structure, because they cant survive with individual life’s without bonding structure

• Particles react
• Cells have intent
• Brain matter makes choices

Ok so,

Particles react is obvious, they react to waves and communicate with entanglement.

Cells have intent, they build a system of entangled particles in a structure of allowing choice over enduring and taking commands – unlike particles without such structure.
They communicate with different methods, among them viruses and our vaccination variation.

Brain matter combines cells of intent in a way to form ability of perception and choice in combination.

Not in agreement?

You cannot form structure of communicated reaction to form intent?

And you think cells cannot compare input to structural information in them and generate responses?

So for a being to react with acting, you first need a Stimulus to one of the beliefs.
Depending on the strength of this Stimulus, there will be a intent resonation that accumulates to either:

• Impossible to act,
• Possible to act, or
• ought to act.

If the Stimulus to belief is strong, it can depending on what the belief is, create an necessary (ought) reaction.

We have so many degrees of freedom, that
Proliferation would eliminate bonding structure over time.

Law only delays this, its effect is limited

Humans do not get rid of bonding structure in case of bonding structure relying on shared beliefs (Religion)

Discuss this posting here:

https://discord.com/channels/1161844765168508958/1337119783354761367/1337119783354761367