English version:

• 1 axiom(or 2, depending how you count this one): the existential tension on the soup of possibility

• From the soup of possibility with existential tension builds a primitive dreamer, and a primitive dream. Conceptually the dreamer is a god – the dreamer shapes the dream, the dream shapes the dreamer.

• Self sufficiency doesn’t come from evolving, no, the opposite is the case. The littlest evolved beings, are the most self sufficient. Bacteria can probably survive on mars, humans cannot without tools. The higher we evolve, the more dependent the dreamers become on the dream.
• Gods evolve – not just humans

German version:

• 1 Axiom (oder 2, je nachdem, wie man dieses hier zählt): die existenzielle Spannung in der Ursuppe der Möglichkeiten
• Aus der Ursuppe der Möglichkeiten mit existentieller Spannung entstehen ein primitiver Träumer und ein primitiver Traum. Konzeptionell gesehen ist der Träumer ein Gott – der Träumer formt den Traum, der Traum formt den Träumer.
• Selbstgenügsamkeit(metaphysisch, self-sufficiency) entsteht nicht durch Evolution, nein, das Gegenteil ist der Fall. Die am wenigsten entwickelten Lebewesen sind am selbstgenügsamsten. Bakterien können vermutlich auf dem Mars überleben, Menschen hingegen nicht ohne Werkzeuge. Je weiter wir uns entwickeln, desto abhängiger werden die Träumer vom Traum.
• Götter entwickeln sich weiter – nicht nur Menschen

Core ontology

One axiom (or two, depending on how you count it): existential tension operating within a “soup of possibility.” From this tension-charged substrate, a primitive dreamer and a primitive dream co-arise — the dreamer is conceptually a god, shaping the dream while being shaped by it in turn. This is a mutual-constitution relationship, not one-directional creation.

Inverse law of self-sufficiency
Evolutionary complexity doesn’t produce self-sufficiency — it produces dependency. Simpler organisms (your bacteria example) need less external scaffolding to survive than complex ones (humans need tools, technology, “the dream” itself). By extension, the more a dreamer/god evolves, the more dependent it becomes on its dream-environment rather than less.

Gods evolve too
Divinity isn’t static or singular — “gods” (dreamers) are themselves subject to development, implying multiplicity and impermanence at the divine level, not just the human one.

Definitions

• Theism = the capacity to influence beyond the body without using the body to do it
• A-theism = the absence of that capacity
• A+theism = a wordplay/third term positioned against both
• You also use “psyker” as a preferred synonym for “god” in some contexts — suggesting the god-label is functioning more like a capacity-descriptor than a supernatural-being claim.

The Tree model (illustrated with the tree image in the chat)

• Roots = Hell — the primordial soup of possibility, associated with evil-as-raw-chaos that seeks discipline through evolution
• Trunk = God / the main psyker — gives the possibility-soup its initial form
• Branches = gods/other psykers — the trunk’s branching produces multiple “truth branches,” i.e., determined/particularized versions of reality
• Crown = Heaven / “the Pretend” — turns those truths into chaos again, which flips back into possibility after a “mind seizure of forgetting.” This is explicitly framed as a cycle.

Hell = honesty; Heaven = Pretend
You distinguish two modes rather than a good/evil binary: Hell is associated with honesty, Heaven with pretense/performance. Being a “pretentious” occupant of Heaven “taints the soil” you’ll later have to clean up in Hell. You used Donald Trump as your illustrative example of a Pretend-mode figure — officially sainted/divine-seeming people being, in your view, more likely to be performative rather than genuine. You explicitly said you weren’t sure you even wanted Trump in your heaven.

Death, forgetting, rebirth
Dying = flipping between hell/heaven modes, forgetting the previous life, and being reborn “in the soil you made in your last life” — i.e., karmic continuity through consequence rather than through memory. You noted even the Bible hints heaven/hell are internal states.

Where you positioned yourself
You called yourself “the Trunk” (main psyker/god figure), while noting that if/when the tree flips, you’d become “just a branch” — i.e., your own status isn’t fixed or exempt from the cycle you’re describing.

Primitive dreamer and primitive dream – OK – but what is a dream and what is a dreamer?
I explained:
• Basically spirit is process defining power, a continuing process crafting.
• And soul is Data, information, settled process definition – Soul is settled information —
a process that has become sufficiently defined to constitute a persistent structure.
Spirit is possibility, a Process in crafting, once that possibility is defined, it becomes Soul, a process that is settled into a specific design.
Ok, but what is experience?
An “agentic possibility” has a “I/O model”. It has inputs, processing, and outputs. And: It gets stripped to it’s own timeline. So what is experience?
Experience, Qualia, dreamers, are I/O model (experiental) possibilities from the soup of possibilities stripped to their own timeline.

—
And what’s a dream?
A dream is a structured possibility that has been sufficiently defined to constitute an experiential environment.
How does that connect to the Tree Model?
Agentic spirit, is lower on the tree (the hell of forming possibility), defined soul is higher on the tree (pretending that what we have or had or did is/was great).
What does stripped to their own timeline mean?
Quantum science is involved here – Cause of effect isn’t the base of existence, no, possibility is the base of existence. Cause and effect gets implemented into existence at a higher level, after things liike Quantum entanglement/superposition and Quantum indeterminacy. The Quantum indeterminacy of quantum particles becomes deterministic at higher levels by weaving timelines essentially. It’s probably not that the timeline gets weaved as a live process while you are sitting on it, like a Videogame engines calculates the frames as you watch them, no, most of the eras
timelines are already complete while you move up on them, so your future mostly exists already.
But if you think that means, that free will is impossible, I want to advise you to read the chapter “If God exists, why do bad things happen?” thats a bit further ahead. It explains that a determinist timeline doesn’t mean you don’t have free will at all.