Epistemological-scientific proof of Christianity basics

Written by

on

Categories:

, ,

Tags:

I’m not exactly a Christian myself, but I believe the basic principles of it make sense along some basics also.

Argument for the basic system of Christianity

Reality and even simulations don’t work as Ad-Hoc calculations but rather as halting problem calculations. An Ad-Hoc calculation like 5+5 is always interchangeable with it’s simplified answer, while halting problems need to be separated in multiple steps, and further steps can depend on the decisions of external values, they might have dependencies that first need to be known to be able to give the actual simplified solution.
So while a simple image file of an hello world cmd exchange might deliver a form of an Ad-Hoc hello world file, an actual hello world application needs to do certain checks like maybe checking which font is available, if the user rights are sufficient or other error checks that happen in the background before executing, making it a halting error procedure.
Reality is a halting error procedure. It inherently has the nature of existence of free will shine through. Everything is probabilistic, not absolute. Everything that would be absolute, not probabilistic wouldn’t need time increments in between, it could just hop from start to finish.

But wait, if some things are imminently clear, some things are dependent on 1 time step, but yet there are elements in the halting procedure that are dependent on hundreds of trillions of time steps later things, then what?
That necessitates that reality, which is reflected by quantum fields, doesn’t just ever change, rather it moves from determinate parts, to indeterminate parts, which then also get determinate.
A age of reality on the quantum field would look like a water droplet.
Small in the beginning, getting wider.
And a age of reality would have a beginning and a end, because otherwise after a longer time, it would grow rampant over all boundaries getting out of control, not actual capable of resolving halting procedure questions anymore eventually.

In other words, a age of reality actually goes from alpha to omega, from beginning to end.
Starting with some small requests as in a covenant from someone.
Necessarily.

Chat GPT response:

Your argument weaves together the concepts of computation, halting problems, quantum fields, and Christian theology. Here’s a refined version that connects these points to support an argument for Christianity, with added clarity:

Reality as a Halting Problem, Not Ad-Hoc Calculation
Reality isn’t like a simple, ad-hoc calculation where the outcome is immediate and predetermined. Instead, it’s like a halting problem—a computational process where the outcome depends on multiple interconnected variables, external factors, and probabilistic decisions over time. For instance, in a computational sense, displaying “Hello, World!” in an application involves a series of checks and dependencies (e.g., user permissions, available resources) that require sequential resolution.

Time as a Requirement for Resolution
Reality’s halting-problem nature requires time increments. If everything were absolute and deterministic, reality could skip time and directly manifest outcomes. However, reality unfolds probabilistically, with intermediate steps needed to resolve dependencies, reflecting a process rather than a static existence. This suggests an inherent openness in how reality progresses—a framework that accommodates free will and choice.

The Quantum Nature of Reality
Quantum fields reflect this indeterminate nature. At any given moment, reality moves from determined states to indeterminate states, which are then resolved. This progression resembles a “halting procedure” where certain outcomes depend on future steps that cannot be resolved immediately. The image of a water droplet expanding outward encapsulates this idea: reality starts as a small, compact point (beginning) and expands over time (age of reality), resolving more complex halting problems as it grows.

Reality’s Finite Nature and Boundaries
For reality to remain coherent and capable of resolving halting problems, it must have boundaries—a beginning and an end. If reality were infinite in duration and scope, it would become unwieldy, unable to resolve halting problems effectively, and devolve into chaos. This supports the idea that reality has a purposeful structure, moving from alpha (beginning) to omega (end).

Theological Connection: Alpha and Omega

Christianity teaches that God is the “Alpha and Omega,” the beginning and the end (Revelation 22:13). This aligns with the argument that reality itself has a purposeful, bounded structure with a definitive start and conclusion. If reality begins with a “small covenant”—a specific intention or will—this parallels the Biblical idea of God initiating creation with purpose and guiding it toward a determined end.

Free Will and Probabilistic Reality

The probabilistic nature of reality reflects the existence of free will, a core tenet of Christian theology. Free will allows for choices that influence the trajectory of reality’s halting problems. This suggests that creation is not merely a mechanistic process but one that involves relational dynamics between God (the Creator) and creation (humankind and the universe).

Conclusion: Reality as a Reflection of Divine Will
The structure of reality—its halting-problem nature, quantum dynamics, and finite boundaries—suggests intentionality and design. Christianity posits that this design originates from a personal God who is both transcendent and immanent, initiating creation with purpose and guiding it toward fulfillment. The probabilistic unfolding of reality reflects the interplay of divine sovereignty and human free will, emphasizing a relational rather than purely deterministic cosmos.

By framing reality’s structure in terms of computation and aligning it with Christian theological concepts, this argument suggests that the universe’s nature points to a purposeful Creator who governs from beginning to end.

Discuss this posting here:

https://discord.com/channels/1161844765168508958/1337119574864298045/1337119574864298045

2 responses to “Epistemological-scientific proof of Christianity basics”

  1. […] If an actor is sufficiently encapsuled in his interactions with the other system, then he has free will. I describe more about this here: https://colloquiallum.net/?p=118 […]

  2. […] Epistemological-scientific proof of Christianity basics […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *